Sustaining Rural Healthcare In the Era of Transformation

December 18, 2025

Managing Director, Management Consulting

Rural hospitals are the backbone of America’s healthcare safety net.

They anchor local economies, provide emergency and inpatient care where no alternative exists, and often serve as the only access point for behavioral health, primary care, and obstetrics in their communities. Yet the sustainability of rural hospitals is under profound strain.

The New Reality

Rural healthcare in the United States is entering a period of monumental and irreversible change. Across much of rural and small-town America, population growth has stalled or declined, the average age of residents continues to rise, and the healthcare workforce is aging faster than it is being replaced. These forces are not cyclical, and they are not temporary. They represent a structural shift in who rural communities serve, what types of care are needed, and how that care must be delivered to remain accessible and financially viable.

The Implication

As a result, the traditional rural hospital model—built around inpatient volume, broad service offerings, and locally staffed facilities—is increasingly misaligned with today’s reality. Sustainability will not come from preserving legacy structures or waiting for utilization patterns to rebound. Instead, rural hospitals and health systems must evolve into more flexible, integrated care platforms—ones that prioritize emergency access, outpatient and chronic care, virtual delivery, and regional partnerships. The question facing rural healthcare leaders is no longer whether change is necessary, but how quickly and intentionally it can be achieved.

According to the University of North Carolina’s Sheps Center, 195 rural hospitals have closed since 2005, and more than 600 additional hospitals are at financial risk of closure nationwide. In states such as Texas, Mississippi, and Kansas, dozens of facilities operate on negative margins year after year.

Even in the Midwest—Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio—where healthcare infrastructure is denser, more than 35 rural hospitals are at risk, several have already closed, and some (like Sturgis Hospital in Michigan) have converted to Rural Emergency Hospitals (REH), eliminating inpatient beds while retaining emergency and outpatient services.

These closures ripple beyond healthcare: they increase travel times, worsen health disparities, and threaten local economic viability. But new opportunities are emerging. The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) and its Rural Health Transformation (RHT) Program dedicate $50 billion over five years to stabilize and transform rural health systems. To be sustainable, however, rural hospitals must adapt their models—balancing financial solvency with their mission of access.

The Financial Landscape:

At-Risk & Transforming

Margins are squeezed by payer mix (Medicare/Medicaid dominant), workforce shortages, and rising capital needs for IT, cybersecurity, and facility modernization. In many counties, more than 60% of physicians are over the age of 55, creating a looming provider access gap (AAMC 2021).

The REH designation offers one pathway: preserving access to ED and outpatient care with enhanced federal reimbursements. But it does so at the cost of local inpatient capacity—a tradeoff that may leave communities vulnerable to delays in emergent transfers and limit access to obstetric or chronic inpatient care.

This funding reflects growing recognition in Washington that rural healthcare faces fundamental challenges. However, it should be understood as an accelerant, not a fix. OBBB does not change the underlying issues facing rural healthcare. Used effectively, it can help organizations implement necessary changes faster and with less disruption. Used in isolation, it risks delaying difficult decisions without addressing structural misalignment. Long-term sustainability will depend less on the availability of federal dollars and more on how deliberately rural systems redesign their care models around future demand.

Rural Population 2024 vs 2045

Although the total rural population remains relatively flat, its composition is undergoing a profound shift.

Older adults are steadily expanding as a share of the population, while younger cohorts stagnate or decline and working-age groups flatten or slowly contract.

As the 65+ population crosses a critical threshold, rural healthcare demand is not diminishing, it is aging, becoming more chronic, more complex, and more resource-intensive.

This is a structural, long-term change, leaving rural health systems to support higher-acuity, higher-utilization patients with fewer working-age residents, caregivers, and clinicians available to meet that demand.

Patients

Rural America is aging faster than urban areas. By 2045, nearly one-quarter of the U.S. population will be over 65, with rural counties skewing older still (U.S. Census Bureau). This means higher demand for chronic disease management, post-acute care, and emergency stabilization.

Providers

The rural physician pipeline is shrinking. AAMC projects a shortfall of up to 124,000 physicians nationally by 2034, with the steepest deficits in primary care and general surgery—precisely the services rural communities rely on.

This demographic mismatch—older patients, older providers, fewer replacements—creates an urgent sustainability challenge.

A Strategy for Sustainable Rural Healthcare

To thrive in this environment, rural hospitals must pursue three strategic imperatives, leveraging OBBB resources and their own market positioning:

Right-size Service Lines

Evaluate which inpatient services are viable based on volume, quality, and access to transfer networks.
Use transformation funds to expand outpatient and virtual care for chronic disease, behavioral health, and preventive services.
Consider REH conversion where inpatient demand is no longer sustainable, but ensure robust transfer agreements with tertiary centers.

Invest in Workforce & Technology

Deploy OBBB funds for rural workforce pipelines: scholarships, service commitments, and telehealth partnerships.
Invest in cybersecurity, EMR interoperability, and remote monitoring to extend reach without duplicating full-service inpatient infrastructure.

Build Regional Networks & Partnerships

Collaborate across counties and systems to share resources (lab, imaging, specialty call).
Explore affiliations with academic or urban health systems for specialty outreach, capital investment, and clinical governance.
Engage payers and employers in value-based models that reward keeping populations healthy locally.

Conclusion: Turning the Corner

The future of rural healthcare will be defined by evolution, not preservation. Sustainable systems will move beyond the assumption that every community must maintain a traditional inpatient hospital and instead focus on delivering the right care, in the right setting, at the right scale. This will require prioritizing access, embracing alternative delivery models, regionalizing complex services, and aligning facilities and staffing with an older, more medically complex population. Federal funding, new designations, and policy reform can help accelerate this transition—but they cannot replace the leadership, strategic clarity, and willingness to redesign care delivery that the next era of rural healthcare demands.

The stakes are high. Rural communities depend on their healthcare systems not only for care, but also for economic stability and community identity. By planning for and implementing meaningful change now, rural healthcare organizations can remain sustainable, relevant, and impactful for generations to come.

Jim Medendorp

Managing Director, Management Consulting

+1 608.410.8000

Take the Next Step

See how ERDMAN is helping organizations realize their potential and make data-driven, meaningful decisions. Explore what’s possible today.

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Phone Number

Message*

I agree to the privacy policy.

October 3, 2022

Sustaining Rural Healthcare In the Era of Transformation

Rural hospitals are the backbone of America’s healthcare safety net.

The New Reality

The Implication